![]() ![]() Understanding of the history of structural racialization is limited among the general public. policy and practices are a greater unknown outside traditional academic environments even seminal court cases such as Plessy are vaguely understood ( Luxenberg 2019). For policymakers, urban development history is often viewed as a distant abstraction, interesting fodder for historic markers, but not a topic receiving deep reflection. These policies would be particularly effective in segregating cities outside the traditional Jim Crow South.ĭespite the significance of this history, deep historical analysis of the African American experience is rarely reflected in policy and public discourse. Racial zoning, restrictive covenants, and exclusionary and expulsive zoning practices would be just the beginning of a complex policy and legal infrastructure to maintain separation in housing and neighborhoods. 1 As Leland Ware (2021) illustrates in " Plessy's Legacy: The Government's Role in the Development and Perpetuation of Segregated Neighborhoods" earlier in this issue, urban development policies in the twentieth century would be one of the primary domains deeply transformed by America's embrace of segregation. Ferguson would be another foundational step in the development of structural racialization through most aspects of twentieth-century society. The study lends support to the importance of public engagement processes to uncover the various long-term ramifications of the "separate but equal" doctrine of Plessy.Īlthough the system of White supremacy in the United States predates Plessy by centuries, the "separate but equal" doctrine emerging from Plessy v. ![]() Surveys, participant observations, and interviews document the outcomes, benefits, and impacts associated with engaging stakeholders using historical records of discrimination to inform contemporary policymaking. The following case study explores two Ohio community-based initiatives (in Cleveland and Columbus) that used historical analysis of racial discrimination in development practices as the focus of a community engagement process. ![]() The history of structural racialization in development is fundamental to understanding contemporary challenges such as segregation, concentrated poverty, and racial disparities. Despite this lack of public awareness, a large body of literature illustrates the importance of urban development history as a mechanism of upholding the philosophy of segregation upheld by Plessy v. Rarely do the public, community leaders, or policymakers engage the history of structural racialization. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |